1. Surveillance
This method is legal if they do not invade a person's reasonable expectation of privacy. It is better to consult legal council and/or the HR department in order to predict the likely events.
Surveillance can be done either stationary/fixed point or moving/trailing. When using both methods it is important to keep a detailed record of all the activities (date, position, time, etc). Trailing has great rewards but has the danger of being caught leading to a higher failure rate. Electronic surveillance may be done by law enforcement using wire-tapping and video cameras.

2. Covert/Undercover Operations
These operations can be time consuming and costly so should only be used when: Large scale collusive fraud, other methods fail, solid predication, secretive in nature, and it complies with the laws of the organization. When an appropriate amount of information is collected it is necessary to inform the authorities.

3. Invigilation
Detailed records should be maintained before, during, after an intense examination period. During the examination there is a very strict adherence to controls. By comparing the results of the examination period to results before and after investigators are able to identify any unusual patterns that arise during the periods when observation is not intensely obvious. The duration of the examination should be at least 14 days and subject to management’s approval.

4. Obtain Physical Evidence
Best place to look for this type of evidence is a suspects computer. Things such as databases, emails, word documents that are stored on their computer require obtaining the legal rights to seize their PC. By checking the documents that are physically present in the suspects office there is a likelihood that you will find a starting point for the investigation.

Executive Fraud Blog: Academic Publications on Fraud, Fraud Investigation  
Fraud BlogLeave a commentTrackback (0)

Trackback address for this post:

http://www.executivefraud.com/htsrv/trackback.php/123

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...

This post has 2642 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Fraud News

  • Bloomberg News Sues Fed Over Lack of Transparency 
  • FBI Probes Mortgage Fraud 
  • Executive Compensation Clawback 
  • Securities Fraud - Oil Contracts 
  • Bernanke Loses Credibility  
  • Reserve Fund Money Market "Broke the Buck" 
  • Paulson Mortgage Fraud Bailout Plan 
  • Health Care Fraud 
  • Hedge Fund Fraud Probe 
  • Red Flags of Click Fraud 
  • Increase in Short Selling was Financial Terrorism? 
  • Rumors of Forming a New Resolution Trust Corporation 
  • Freakonomics of Subprime Credit Crisis 
  • Subprime Crisis Timeline 
  • SEC Issues New Short Selling Rules 
  • Financial Sector Sees $1.86 Trillion Decrease in Value 
  • Federal Reserve Turns Their Back on Taxpayers and Bails Out AIG 
  • Antitrust Investigation of Yahoo & Google Partnership 
  • KB Home's CEO Karatz Settles Stock Option Backdating Case 
  • AIG Seeks $75 Billion Line of Credit 
  • Washington Mutual's Trouble with Option Adjustible Rate Mortgages 
  • Fannie & Freddie Bailout = Trouble for Banks Seeking Financing 
  • Fidelity Settles $300 Million in Auction Rate Securities 
  • Subprime Litigation Exceeds Savings and Loan Crisis 
  • Senators Want to Cut Pay for Ex-Executives From Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 
  • XML Feeds

    What is this?
    Executive Fraud Blog